ICEA Urges PE Rule Review To Boost India's Manufacturing Edge

• ICEA calls on the government to review the old Place of Effective Management (PE) rule to strengthen India’s manufacturing edge.
• The association says the current PE regime deters foreign and domestic investments due to complex compliance and tax exposure.
• ICEA believes reforming PE rules will help attract global supply chains, boost high-tech electronics manufacturing, and make India more competitive globally.

The India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) urged reconsideration of the old PE (place of effective management) regulation, stating reforms are necessary to boost India's manufacturing competitiveness and push production to world levels. According to ICEA, the regime currently discourages foreign and domestic investment in the manufacturing industry, including electronics, because of complex compliance procedures and unintended tax exposure. Going back to the rules, they argue, can free up capital, ease decision-making, and unleash efficiencies necessary to compete internationally.

ICEA mentions some pressing goals in calling for amendment. First, they believe that a revised PE regime will enable Indian units to acquire greater command over international supply chains by rendering exports more cost-effective. Second, the changeover is likely to induce new investments, especially in high-tech electronics manufacturing, which is regulation-sensitive and capital-intensive.

And third, they believe that a more facilitative regime of PE would trigger higher productivity and competitiveness, especially when India is set to be a feasible alternative to other competitive manufacturing hubs of the world.

Except for the PE rule, ICEA has invariably emphasized that industrial electronics need to be considered a national strategic priority. They contend that till India formulates policy structures specifically catering to the requirements of advanced manufacturing of electronics, electronics objectives such as achieving a vision of $500 billion electronics manufacturing in fiscal year 2031 will always be written on paper.

Also Read: Govt Sets Up Committee To Review Tax And Export Issues In Manufacturing Sector

Against this, a more investment-friendly PE regime appears as part of an overall policy shift combining infrastructure outlay, incentives, and regulation streamlining. While the appeal to association is directed at tax and regulatory reform, the philosophical premise lies clear: India must break free from structural constraints if it is to be successful in a high-tech production economy.

By aligning the PE regime with modern business models of digital, global, and distributed operations, ICEA believes Indian manufacturing plants will be in a better place to lure more multinational anchor investments and grow indigenous electronics firms. The moment, they assert, is ripe: global supply chains are being recalibrated, and countries that cut investor friction stand to gain a lot from the process.

If the government decides to implement these recommendations, the manufacturing industry would benefit through a chain of beneficial consequences: enhanced capital inflow, improved economies of scale, more directed productivity, and improved export competitiveness. ICEA is hence pinning its hopes on a prompt and considered reassessment of the PE rule to allow for the unlocking of inherent potential in India's manufacturing and electronics industries and decrease the regulatory drag currently retarding India's rise in global value chains.