point
Menu
Browse by year:
The Smart Techie was renamed Siliconindia India Edition starting Feb 2012 to continue the nearly two decade track record of excellence of our US edition.

January - 2011 - issue > In My Opinion

Beyond the Metros: Bringing IT Opportunities to Tier II and III Cities

Sajan Pillai
Monday, January 3, 2011
Sajan Pillai
When we started our operations in 1999, we were looking for the perfect location for our offshore development centers. Our choice surprised everyone around us. “Why would you choose Kerala?” asked our well-wishers. Kerala’s industrialization in 1999 included ER&DC, Keltron, and a few small private companies peppered over Technopark. No global company had a significant presence in the state, and prospects were hesitant to take the plunge.

We decided to look at the facts rather than believe the propaganda. The quality of education in Kerala is among the best in this part of the world. The people, too, are surprisingly cosmopolitan from years of exposure to different cultures and from considerable migration to and from the state. The workforce is highly stable and productive, while the government at the time was slowly waking up to the potential of a service economy. We decided: Kerala had to be the right place.

Today, we have grown to 500 times our original strength, largely because about 60 percent of our workforce is located in Kerala. When we looked at the big cities—what we now call Tier I, at least in the Indian context—we saw the advent of a whole lot of industrial clusters, corridors, estates, hubs, and other business units. When looking at possible target sites, we envisioned a model that took two basic elements into consideration. First, that the concept of outsourcing was primarily driven by the desire for cheaper talent and reduced operational costs. There was also social displacement—the need for people to immigrate to find work. The Tier I cities were becoming saturated with people and were nearing the limits of their infrastructures. It became very apparent that these limits would have an adverse impact on our ability to reduce costs while operating in these locations.

Tier II and III cities were a refreshing alternative, once the model was seen to work. Suddenly, there were a whole lot of them to invest in. Competition among these cities is intense, and this is where key differentiators can come into play to help with cost reductions. In terms of social displacement, the use of Tier II and III cities makes use of what you might call an IT “necklace strategy” that builds mega-centers offering employment opportunities to the masses in more dispersed areas around, rather than in the country’s biggest cities. Eliminating much of the social displacement in this way is one of the biggest social benefits of Information Technology. And being a service industry, there are no environmental concerns to worry about, either.

Attrition is a costly affair in most organizations—the cost of replacing an employee is estimated to be 1.5 times the employee’s annual compensation. UST Global has been successful in keeping attrition to a level well below industry standards, primarily due to efficient employee engagement practices. Since employment must have consequences more far-reaching than simple contentment with a job well done, a well-engaged workforce results in happy employees, which in turn reduces attrition. Traditionally, businesses have tried to speak the language of “employee satisfaction,” but that is being rapidly replaced in favor of “employee engagement.” In this context, engaged employees are an essential factor for any business, but the requirements don’t end there.


Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Reader's comments(2)
1:This is a well written article from Sajan Pillai, CEO, UST Global. This aptly explains how the Tier 2,3 cities provide many advantages but also need the fast infrastructure for the investors to bring in the projects. There are lot of very good tier 2,3 cities in both Kerala, Karnataka that will meet the needs of mant top companies such as UST Global. Like in the US, well developed tier 2,3 cities will add a lot of value to the businesses and people alike.
Posted by: Guru gbk - 05th Jan 2011
2:This is a well written article from Sajan Pillai, CEO, UST Global. This aptly explains how the Tier 2,3 cities provide many advantages but also need fast infrastructure for the investors to bring in the projects. There are a lot of very good tier 2,3 cities in both Kerala, Karnataka that will meet the needs of many top companies such as UST Global. Like in the US, well developed tier 2,3 cities will add a lot of value to the businesses and people alike.
Guru gbk replied to: Guru gbk post - 05th Jan 2011
Disclaimer
Messages posted on this Web site under the `Comments' area are solely the opinions of those who have posted them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd or its site www.siliconindia.com. Gossip, mud slinging and malicious attacks on individuals and organizations are strictly prohibited. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd can not be held responsible for errors or omissions in content, nor for the authenticity of the user/company name or email addresses associated with posted messages. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd reserves the right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or any other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous, or otherwise offensive or inappropriate.Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd do not endorse the products and services or any other offerings mentioned in these messages.