In this article we are describing on how to identify and prioritize the risk when selecting a Six Sigma Project. You can use the templates from the Statistical Software Minitab & Quality Companionfree trial version for 30 days or Licensed Version which are frequently used by the Six Sigma Consultant.
Each time a project is undertaken, it is accompanied by risk. Many organizations fail to adequately consider this aspect of a project until it surfaces.
However, risk can be identified in advance and steps taken to manage it properly. This chapter will discuss the concept of risk and the tools available for successfully managing it.
The major components of any risk management program include the following key areas as defined by the Project Management Institute:
• Risk management planning. According to Turk (2008), “The Risk Management Plan presents the strategy and ground rules, defines the stakeholders, sets the objectives of the program, defines the process and organization structure, and presents roles and responsibilities. It may contain the templates for documentation associated with the program. . . . The plan should also present requirements for prioritizing and closing the risks.”
What is a risk factor? A risk factor must describe the risk event clearly and concisely in a manner similar to the way the “potential failure mode” or “potential cause” columns in FMEA documents are completed. Table 6.1 provides a useful starting point for identifying various types of risk. Often it is useful to categorize risks in a meaningful way. For example, risk might be categorized as: schedule, budget, technical, quality, personnel, and so on. Categorization can bring additional insight into the risk management process, as it is possible that a risk strategy that applies to a particular risk event could apply to more than one event in the same category.
Table 1.0 Potential types and forms of risk that could affect an organization.
Legal action |
Noncompliance with regulatory requirements |
Environmental violations |
Customer errors |
Customer payment delinquencies and non-payment |
Supplier errors |
Raw material defects |
Subcontractor non-conformance |
Errors and omissions |
Financial investments (unexpected or unacceptable yield) |
Failed projects or inadequate return on investment from projects |
Product liability |
Employee wrongdoing |
Sabotage |
Accidents |
Catastrophic loss |
Civil unrest or terrorist attack |
Damage from military action or political upheaval |
Vandalism |
Product obsolescence |
Inadequate or omitted controls (over processes, finances, employees, suppliers, subcontractors, and so on) |
Inattention to danger signals from controls |
Illegal or unethical behaviour on the part |
Disqualification for certifications, licenses, |
of management |
permits |
Unwanted buyout/takeover of organization |
Unexpected death, disability, or departure of key personnel |
Example: - A proposed Lean Six Sigma project is aimed at improving quality to attract one or two new customers. The project will cost $3M. Previous experience indicates that the probability of getting customer A is between 60% and 70%, and the probability of getting customer B is between 10% and 20%. The probability of getting both A and B is between 5% and 10%. One way to analyse this problem is to make two tables, one for the worst case and the other for the best case, as shown in Table 1.2
Assuming the data are correct, the project will improve profit of the enterprise by between $1M and $2.5M.
Table 1.2 Example of quantifying risk.
|
|
Worst case |
|
Best case |
|||
|
|
|
|
Profit × |
|
|
Profit × |
Outcome |
|
Profit ($M) |
Probability |
Probability |
Profit ($M) |
Probability |
Probability |
A only |
|
2.00 |
0.60 |
1.20 |
2.00 |
0.70 |
1.40 |
B only |
|
2.00 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
2.00 |
0.20 |
0.40 |
A and B |
|
7.00 |
0.05 |
0.35 |
7.00 |
0.10 |
0.70 |
None |
|
(3.00) |
0.25 |
(0.75) |
(3.00) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
Expected profit = |
1.00 |
Expected profit = |
2.50 |
Further to conclude you have to take into account all the risks associated in the Project and take specific steps as mentioned in the paper, you can also brainstorm with process owners, heads of departments of an organization to prioritize risks.