(17)
Sign in to your SiliconIndia account
Email:       Password:  
Don't have SiliconIndia account? Sign up     Forgot your password? Reset

Rupert Murdoch to take news off Google

By SiliconIndia,Tuesday, 10 November 2009, 01:47 Hrs
Bangalore: Rupert Murdoch, the media czar who heads prime news sources like The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, 20th Century Fox and Fox News, has threatened Google that he will soon pull the plug to make his sites disappear from Google listing.

In an interview with Sky News Australia, Murdoch accused Google, Microsoft, and others of "stealing" his company's content. When asked why he doesn't pull his web sites from Google's search results he replied, "I think we will. But that's when we start charging."
Rupert Murdoch to take news off Google


So far the company has been earning money through advertising content, but now Murdoch and other News Corporation executives have said that they intend to charge readers and viewers. When asked why he would buck the trend of offering free content, Murdoch said, "(The public) shouldn't have had it free. I think we've been asleep. What's the point of having someone come occasionally who likes a headline they see in Google? The fact is there isn't enough advertising in the world to go around to make all the web sites profitable. We'd rather have fewer people coming to our web sites but paying," reported CNET.

Google has said that it feels obligated to help media companies because it needs their content. Google responded to Murdoch's comments in a report by The Telegraph. "Publishers put their content on the web because they want it to be found," Google said in a statement. "Very few choose not to include their material in Google News and web search. But if they tell us not to include it, we don't."

Google says that it only takes two lines of computer code added to a file called "robots.txt," which every website uses to tell search engines where, or not, to wander. So if it is so easy to do so then why isn't Murdoch pulling the plug. The decision to do so can be a big gamble and can backfire badly for Murdoch. Once Murdoch takes his sites off Google, internet advertising based revenue will almost disappear.

On the other hand, paying to read news article might bring in more revenue than advertising. It will also bring an end to the content being copied by other news websites. If a news website is the first with a scoop, it will soon be buried under the avalanche of copies and rewrites that sucks any value out of being ahead of the crowd.

In that regard, Murdoch's desire to get away from the roundabout of Google News is sensible as he has an old-fashioned vision of the value of journalism.

Google, meanwhile, will remain unmoved. "Google delivers more than a billion consumer visits to newspaper websites each month. These visits offer the publishers a business opportunity, the chance to hook a reader with compelling content, to make money with advertisements or to offer online subscriptions," wrote Google Senior Business Product Manager Josh Cohen in a blog post. "The truth is that news publishers, like all other content owners, are in complete control when it comes not only to what content they make available on the web, but also who can access it and at what price."

The readers will be most affected by this, who by now are used to free content and e-paper culture. Paying to read online news might not appeal to majority of readers and Murdoch will have to venture into unchartered territory to rope in revenue.

   
Write your comment now     |     Submit your news/press release


Your Name    Email: 
Type the characters you see in the picture

  Cancel
Let our editorial department know about any news about your company, your organization, or yourself, or any press release that you have. If we find it suitable for our audience, we will contact you and make a news. Please also share any links for the news.

Chr left
Your name     Email 
Type the characters you see in the picture

Reader's comments (17)
1: Btw if Murdoch can charge for the news at his sites, then perhaps the next in line would be charges put forth by those who create the news :D..... This might have worked sometime back... but not now... there's no definite revenue the readers are going to make by reading the news, atleast the majority of them.... so there's no point paying for it :)
Posted by: Antony - 23 May, 2010

2: Ha ha sounds so funny. Paying to read news on the net when we can actually see it on TV besides getting the news from innumerable other news sites. The idea of charging viewers for reading news from the sites itself seems foolish, specially in the days of RSS feeds and the blogs. Ok Mr Murdoch, I wish u good luck in your effort of going bankrupt. And thank you for making me laugh. Its a long time I had such a hearty laugh. Ha ha ha ha ha............
Posted by: Binoy - 13 Nov, 2009

3: If Google is giving so many leads and Murdoch is receiving them and if still he is not happy, then it means a few things about those sites, their advertisers, google and the clickers.

Murdoch's sites are not generating revenue by the clickers.
Murdoch's advertisers are not happy with him.
Murdoch's sites are not so attractive to establish long time relationships.
Clicks dont pay.
Posted by: Edcare - 11 Nov, 2009

4: Henry Ford once said `i am happy to offer a car of any colour as long as its black!' Murdoch, another Ford in the making.

A mistake by so-called business. Here comes a 21st century czar with a 19th century mindset!

Is it age? OR
Are his companies sinking without no other revenues? OR
Is he trying to kill his company? OR
An sheer audacity that he has a thriving business?

The question is why should news be charged? As if we are dying to read news from his websites and channels?

Ghosh, I can't remember when me, my family members, relatives and friends last saw a Star TV channel! We are glued to the regional channels for all info.

And then there are news sites like indiatimes, yahoo, cnn ibn, name it.... even BBC and other world news sites for information. Here is a media czar trying to kill his company! There are hundreds of sites that give news. As long as the acknowledgements and source of news is clearly mentioned, he should have no problem. Let him get his revenues from advertisements and sponsorships, not by selling news! Good ol' newspaper boy.

Remove all bookmarks of their sites, that's the best solution.
Posted by: Smanojs - 11 Nov, 2009

5: Howsoever Murdoch vs Google is going to be, I would personally ask Murdoch just to stay away from the rest of the world. Later, when he feels like to return, probably then the world would have become different and may be that he is charged to list his name on the Google.

I do not feel that the netizens will ever loose something. It may happen that the name of those news channels will simply loose currency.

If Murdoch feels that he is having unsolicited guests and pennyless visitors, probably in times to come, the so called guests and visitors may quite sooner call the shots.

Happy Murdoch, go lucky.

I am personally interested to observe your experiment at your own cost.

Give me that pie.
Posted by: Edcare - 11 Nov, 2009

6: information should be free
Posted by: hemant - 11 Nov, 2009

7: It is not going to affect Google in anyway. Number of views for Rupert Murdoch's news sites may go less.
Posted by: Prathap - 10 Nov, 2009

8: Dear Mr. Rupert Murdoch,

Please don't be so arrogant on Google news .
Can you swear that you (or your reporters and editors)have not
used Google or other news sources to bring out your news copy? .
You cannot see your own back ? right
Posted by: Hans - 10 Nov, 2009

9: In a way I do agree with Rupert Murdoch by threatening to pull off the Google platform. He won't have made a comment with any prior research and analysis done.
Posted by: Selvan Shiv Kumar - 10 Nov, 2009

10: He is just pulling himself into a nice hole. I think, he does'nt quite understand the web , nobody wants to pay for anything here.
Google and microsoft are going to eat his lunch.
Posted by: vengu - 10 Nov, 2009

11: All news is bad news anyway ....never read it myself. Besides it is so manipulated and misleading. who cares?
Posted by: Anthia  - 10 Nov, 2009

12:Perfect right..i do agree with you..
 Abhishek replied to: Anthia  
 post - 10 Nov, 2009

13: we will miss it
Posted by: vichoo nair shree - 10 Nov, 2009

14: Rupert Murdoch has played hard ball all his life ... so this move is no surprise. However, he will have a tough time getting control of the fundamental paradigm shift that is gaining momentum in his field. He has profited mightily from more and more revenue from shallower and shallower news ... and now we are moving to deeper news that cannot be easily controlled for simplistic media and political messages. Go Google!
Posted by: Peter Burgess - 10 Nov, 2009

15:When the titans such as he fall, it will be said of them..

The minstrels and the wandering bards
Paid homage to a house of cards

Dr. Karan
 Dr. Karan Aggarwala replied to: Peter Burgess 
 post - 10 Nov, 2009

16: In the war between Murdoch and Google, reader will be effected the most. Imagine having to pay for news. If one company starts doing that then everyone will follow.
Posted by: Zoeb - 10 Nov, 2009

17:It doesnt matter.. its not the reader but the news company which will be at a loss there are billions of sites that will provide necessary input for the news... u dont worry we would be far better off if people like Murdoch pull their plugs.. other news websites will draw more ad revenue.. in todays world of free journalism no one should even think of charging for just posting news...
 Mittal replied to: Zoeb 
 post - 10 Nov, 2009
Disclaimer
Messages posted on this Web site under the `Comments' area are solely the opinions of those who have posted them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd or its site www.siliconindia.com. Gossip, mud slinging and malicious attacks on individuals and organizations are strictly prohibited. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd can not be held responsible for errors or omissions in content, nor for the authenticity of the user/company name or email addresses associated with posted messages. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd reserves the right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or any other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous, or otherwise offensive or inappropriate.Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd do not endorse the products and services or any other offerings mentioned in these messages.
Beautiful and dress selection, please go to Dresses
Plan on visiting the Lotus Temple? Get Great Deals on Delhi Hotels !
Buy India Wholesale Products on DHgate.com
SPOTLIGHT



News:           Technology   |   Enterprise IT   |   Tech Products   |   Startups   |   Finance   |   Business   |   Career   |   Magazine  |   Dailydose   |   News archive   |  
RSS
Network:       Network   |   Profile   |   Messages   |   Scrapbook   |   Find   |   Blogs   |   Communities   |   Events   |   Q&A   |   CXO Insights  
Career:        Jobs   |   Companies     |   Mentorship   |   Videos   |   Career blogs   |   Training institutions  |   Freshers
Online courses:   Web developer   |   Java developer   |   CCNA training   |   SEO   |   SAS   |   SQL server 2005   |   J2EE
Education:   MBA   |  MCA   |   Engineering   |   Overseas Education   |   Internship
Life:                  Jokes   |    Bookstore   |   Relocate  |  Marketplace
Cities:             Startup   |  Real estate   |   Finance  
Company:   About us   |   Contact   |   Help   |   Community rules   |   Advertise with us   |   Sitemap
Member directory:   A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z   
and help us continue to improve SiliconIndia
© 2010 SiliconIndia all rights reserved