Quit smoking, get 10 percent hike
By
siliconindia news bureau
| Tuesday,29 December 2009, 18:38 hrs
|
Bangalore: Quit smoking and get a 10 percent hike in basic pay. That is the offer made by the head of a Bangalore based firm to coax his colleagues to quit smoking in 2010, reports Debi Prasad Sarangi of Bangalore Mirror.
"The idea is to ensure that employees adopt a healthy lifestyle," says A C Ramesh, CEO, Focus Engineering Services, who plans to lead by example. Ramesh has been a smoker for the last 25 years and plans to quit the bad habit, which, he thinks, would have some positive impact on his colleagues.

Focus has close to 40 employees and its clients include the Confident Group, Embassy Group and ISRO. According to Ramesh, 50 percent of his colleagues are chain-smokers. Concerns about his and their health prompted Ramesh to come up with this idea. "I have had enough of smoking and drinking for the last 25 years. Now, I want to put an end to these vices for the sake of my health and that of my family. Suddenly, I thought of getting my colleagues also to do the same, but realized that concern for their health alone won't motivate all of them. I expect the 10 percent bonus, in addition to the regular hike, to do the trick. And, if my men are in good health, my company will also be in good health."
Ramesh's colleagues are already banned from smoking when they are in a client's office or premises. But, there is a rider. "Anyone violating the pact faces a 20 percent pay cut," says Ramesh. "I was planning to introduce the bonus for those who quit both smoking and drinking. But, after discussions with senior colleagues, I decided to start with smoking. A packet of cigarettes costs about Rs. 40 and is within the reach of most people, and, hence, has far-reaching consequences. Any person can smoke 10 cigarettes every day."
Karthik Anand, a Project Engineer in Focus said, "I would definitely quit smoking. If my boss can do it, why can't I? This will only help me in the future. I have been smoking for last 15 years. Earlier, I used to smoke three packets, but of late have cut down to one pack."
"The idea is to ensure that employees adopt a healthy lifestyle," says A C Ramesh, CEO, Focus Engineering Services, who plans to lead by example. Ramesh has been a smoker for the last 25 years and plans to quit the bad habit, which, he thinks, would have some positive impact on his colleagues.

Focus has close to 40 employees and its clients include the Confident Group, Embassy Group and ISRO. According to Ramesh, 50 percent of his colleagues are chain-smokers. Concerns about his and their health prompted Ramesh to come up with this idea. "I have had enough of smoking and drinking for the last 25 years. Now, I want to put an end to these vices for the sake of my health and that of my family. Suddenly, I thought of getting my colleagues also to do the same, but realized that concern for their health alone won't motivate all of them. I expect the 10 percent bonus, in addition to the regular hike, to do the trick. And, if my men are in good health, my company will also be in good health."
Ramesh's colleagues are already banned from smoking when they are in a client's office or premises. But, there is a rider. "Anyone violating the pact faces a 20 percent pay cut," says Ramesh. "I was planning to introduce the bonus for those who quit both smoking and drinking. But, after discussions with senior colleagues, I decided to start with smoking. A packet of cigarettes costs about Rs. 40 and is within the reach of most people, and, hence, has far-reaching consequences. Any person can smoke 10 cigarettes every day."
Karthik Anand, a Project Engineer in Focus said, "I would definitely quit smoking. If my boss can do it, why can't I? This will only help me in the future. I have been smoking for last 15 years. Earlier, I used to smoke three packets, but of late have cut down to one pack."
Reader's comments(147)
1: Smoking causes injurious to smokers, but
cuses very serious injury to non smokers...
like that if smokers get 1o percent hike why
dont non smokers get 20 percennt or more
that.
Posted by: Vvivekanandan - 20 Jan, 2010
2: its a grt idea it will help the younger youth
also.
Posted by: piyush jain - 19 Jan, 2010
3: its a very good idea..... we people should
try to implement this all over India so that
employees in all organization will be
benefited...
Posted by: Srinivasan Krishnamoorthy - 05 Jan, 2010
4: Now because of this the non-smokers might be
regretting why they did not start smoking
before...
I wish I was working with Remash, I would have got a pay hike as I stopped smoking...
I wish I was working with Remash, I would have got a pay hike as I stopped smoking...
Posted by: Johnson Babichen - 04 Jan, 2010
5: Self Conscious and Awareness can make a
person to do what he want to do.
In any circumstances, say smoking ,if he can resist to smoke he can do.
Hike is for external pleasure so that a person can quit smoke/ reduce smoke for how many days?
In any circumstances, say smoking ,if he can resist to smoke he can do.
Hike is for external pleasure so that a person can quit smoke/ reduce smoke for how many days?
Posted by: Vivek - 04 Jan, 2010
6: Dear ramesh,
Compliments for the purity of the thought. Guys every decision has its pros and cons. I have been a smoker for 32 years and I had quit on number of occasions for durations varing from three months to a year but on 05 Oct 2009 i quit this habbit by my own choice and I am enjoying life. It is the individual wish power which provokes the will power to achieve what you want to achieve.
Ramesh I suggest that you combine your effort on social level by involving the families for their support.
Empathise with the person and make him believe that it is for his good and can be achieved.
remember nothing is impossible, only the effort has to be sustained to achieve results.
Col Vijay Batra, SM
Compliments for the purity of the thought. Guys every decision has its pros and cons. I have been a smoker for 32 years and I had quit on number of occasions for durations varing from three months to a year but on 05 Oct 2009 i quit this habbit by my own choice and I am enjoying life. It is the individual wish power which provokes the will power to achieve what you want to achieve.
Ramesh I suggest that you combine your effort on social level by involving the families for their support.
Empathise with the person and make him believe that it is for his good and can be achieved.
remember nothing is impossible, only the effort has to be sustained to achieve results.
Col Vijay Batra, SM
Posted by: Col Vijay Batra,SM - 03 Jan, 2010
7: this a very good decision taken by the firm.
others should also follow this.
Posted by: dr kirantewari - 03 Jan, 2010
8: good going by ramesh and i wish u make
success in future with your new toughts
Posted by: pavan - 03 Jan, 2010
9: Boss be carefull..if i would have been i ur
employees place. I would quit for salaries
sake but in reality would prefer smoking a
cigarettte which is more lighter.
Posted by: Shaji - 02 Jan, 2010
10: Well good idea.but the salary hike cant
change the man character.its up to the
atmosphere we living.
Posted by: ashok - 02 Jan, 2010
11: it's good idea but this is not solution of
problem , solution will be govt. make a
norms.................
Posted by: kumud ranjan mishra - 02 Jan, 2010
12: nice..try it.
But to me, it looks like you are dragging onlookers around while you plan to jump off the hill.
Chain smoker to No smoking with FORCE= Dissatisfaction and Rage..just a thought!
But to me, it looks like you are dragging onlookers around while you plan to jump off the hill.
Chain smoker to No smoking with FORCE= Dissatisfaction and Rage..just a thought!
Posted by: justchill - 02 Jan, 2010
13: it's good idea, but How do you monitor
whether they are smoking or not?
Posted by: monish - 02 Jan, 2010
14: VASECTOMY AND SMOKING :
I see the relationship in the context of lifestyle. The pay hike aims at altering behavior and to bring about a change in lifestyle. Many of you may think that vasectomy is good for the country in view of our population explosion. The individual has no health benefit from this surgery and it may actually contribute to other health problems related to the prostate gland. An individual benefits only when he practices safe sex and in that context the use of condom is more relevant than the operation of vasectomy. Employees should seek smoke free environment at work place. The Company that I work for charges about $250 per year as a fee to provide health insurance coverage to employees who use tobacco. The Company also provides about $1,800 per year to each employee( and the family included ) to keep themselves in good health. This amount could be used for a smoking cessation program if the employee wants to quit using tobacco. Employees who are in good health can save this money and take it forward for use in the next year. I had saved over $11,000 for staying in good health. This is only a health related benefit and is not a pay hike. Smoking could be stress related. We need to make the work environment less stressful and improve the stress resistance of employees and then the use of tobacco would come down dramatically.
I see the relationship in the context of lifestyle. The pay hike aims at altering behavior and to bring about a change in lifestyle. Many of you may think that vasectomy is good for the country in view of our population explosion. The individual has no health benefit from this surgery and it may actually contribute to other health problems related to the prostate gland. An individual benefits only when he practices safe sex and in that context the use of condom is more relevant than the operation of vasectomy. Employees should seek smoke free environment at work place. The Company that I work for charges about $250 per year as a fee to provide health insurance coverage to employees who use tobacco. The Company also provides about $1,800 per year to each employee( and the family included ) to keep themselves in good health. This amount could be used for a smoking cessation program if the employee wants to quit using tobacco. Employees who are in good health can save this money and take it forward for use in the next year. I had saved over $11,000 for staying in good health. This is only a health related benefit and is not a pay hike. Smoking could be stress related. We need to make the work environment less stressful and improve the stress resistance of employees and then the use of tobacco would come down dramatically.
Posted by: Major Retd Rebbapragada - 31 Dec, 2009
15: it's good that an employer is thnking and
caring abt health of his employees and plans
to do something different. Just to be fare
with non smokers I think little variation can
do the trick, cut 10% of basic for smokers !
And more than why not put up fight against
tobacco nationwide? Govt should also put some
brakes on companies producing tobacco
products as it's going to save country from
massive trouble in terms of medical expenses,
loss of lives. Make it difficult to sell
cigarettes, just like drugs.Smoking is bigger
national enimy than rival countries. All
natizens can put pressure on govts to do
this.
Posted by: Armansh - 31 Dec, 2009

16:dear armansh
i convinced them to have the grace to accept since they are increasing the life span of their colleages.
regards
ramesh
i convinced them to have the grace to accept since they are increasing the life span of their colleages.
regards
ramesh
ramesh replied to: Armansh
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

17:Wow!Innovations while giving hike - great
initiative by ramesh.But the question is how
would the company track its employees who
smoke outside the company.I believe it is
impossible to follow each and every smoker
and check whether he quit smoking or not.This
is not going to work unless employees are
honest.
We have to cut the roots of smoking.Most of the people start smoking during their college days.Cigarette shops are laid in front of all most all the colleges and they are considered to be landmarks or hubs or most happening places near a college.This stimulates lot of college students to start smoking.Government should take some steps to put some regulations on smoking - age limit,restrictions on selling cigarettes near a college etc.'It is easier to cut a tree when it is small rather than when it grows big'
We have to cut the roots of smoking.Most of the people start smoking during their college days.Cigarette shops are laid in front of all most all the colleges and they are considered to be landmarks or hubs or most happening places near a college.This stimulates lot of college students to start smoking.Government should take some steps to put some regulations on smoking - age limit,restrictions on selling cigarettes near a college etc.'It is easier to cut a tree when it is small rather than when it grows big'
Nir Reddy replied to: Armansh
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
18: I dont see any seriousness in these kinds of
news, at least in India. The things are
shortlived and one media print satisfies its
implementation persistence.
Posted by: suhas - 31 Dec, 2009
19: Either it is started to save down-time during
work or to make the smokers quit smoking,the
idea is good in all respects. I wish this be
started by more and more employers in India
and in Pakistan also. This is the one trick
we can get rid of this curse...
Posted by: Mohsin Ali (Pakistan) - 30 Dec, 2009
20: Hey GOOD thing done by Ramesh . I think this
is a new year resolution to his company on
whole . All the very Best . I wish u a very
happy n succesful New year
Posted by: Megha - 30 Dec, 2009

21:thanks megha wish you happy new year
ramesh replied to: Megha
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
22: All smokers will quit automatically the day
they die!
Posted by: Rahul Muthu - 30 Dec, 2009
23: wel on a serious note.. idea is very gud..
BUT BUT BUT
I find it more convincing for non smokers to START smoking.. n den QUIT .. not a bad idea to get a hike ... what say people
I find it more convincing for non smokers to START smoking.. n den QUIT .. not a bad idea to get a hike ... what say people
Posted by: Labham Gupta - 30 Dec, 2009

24:I agree with you. They should give first more
hike to those who are not smoking and then
focus on those are smoking and this should be
one time offer.
bij replied to: Labham Gupta
post - 02 Jan, 2010
post - 02 Jan, 2010

25:I think the target here is to keep the
employees from going out of office for
smoking breaks..consider this way, of the 8
hours an employee works, to complete one
cigarette and come back to place and work it
takes a minimum of 10 mins, imagine if one
person smokes 10 cigarettes a day, he saves
100 minutes :) i think this is a good
trick...
shake replied to: Labham Gupta
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

26:Smoking surely is not good. I support people
quit smorking. And I am not a Hype. I love to
make my life more lovely with my new
inventions. Anybody is interest, you may
visit my blog and be my friend:
http://www.araschnia.com/carfield1980.
Kevin replied to: Labham Gupta
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
27: World needs to implement the idea of Ramesh!
Posted by: Bezzanki - 30 Dec, 2009
28: A PAY HIKE STORY FROM THE PAST :
Many of today's young readers may not know India's recent history. Smt. Indira Gandhi got kicked out of her job when her son assumed extra-constitutional powers and imposed his will upon Indian citizens.He had promoted the idea of Family Planning by using a surgical procedure called VASECTOMY. There were numerous instances when young men were forced to undergo this operation. There was jubilation on the streets when Indira Gandhi was soundly defeated.People were outraged. After a short eclipse from power, Indira Gandhi got back her job. The central government still pursued the policy of promoting Vasectomy. The government said that they would give a pay hike to all of its employees who are willing to undergo Vasectomy. During 1980, while I was serving as a Major in Indian Army, I was posted at Secunderabad.When this rule for pay hike was introduced, I was tempted by the offer. What an easy way to increase your basic pay, and the surgery is free and it includes seven days rest at home. But, Indira Gandhi was not the ruler at the home where I lived. The extra-constitutional authority at my home exercised 'veto' powers and told me that I cannot get the "PAY HIKE". I had no choice. I could not appeal her decision. I did not get the pay hike. Fortunately, there were no adverse effects on my health other than the loss of pay and its enjoyment.
Many of today's young readers may not know India's recent history. Smt. Indira Gandhi got kicked out of her job when her son assumed extra-constitutional powers and imposed his will upon Indian citizens.He had promoted the idea of Family Planning by using a surgical procedure called VASECTOMY. There were numerous instances when young men were forced to undergo this operation. There was jubilation on the streets when Indira Gandhi was soundly defeated.People were outraged. After a short eclipse from power, Indira Gandhi got back her job. The central government still pursued the policy of promoting Vasectomy. The government said that they would give a pay hike to all of its employees who are willing to undergo Vasectomy. During 1980, while I was serving as a Major in Indian Army, I was posted at Secunderabad.When this rule for pay hike was introduced, I was tempted by the offer. What an easy way to increase your basic pay, and the surgery is free and it includes seven days rest at home. But, Indira Gandhi was not the ruler at the home where I lived. The extra-constitutional authority at my home exercised 'veto' powers and told me that I cannot get the "PAY HIKE". I had no choice. I could not appeal her decision. I did not get the pay hike. Fortunately, there were no adverse effects on my health other than the loss of pay and its enjoyment.
Posted by: Major Retd Rebbapragada - 30 Dec, 2009

29:Vasectomy & Smoking!
What a Comparison? and for What & Why?
But then it's a Personal Choice.
But then look at our Population - We will be No.1 Soon & Very Soon.
Statutary Warning on the Cigratte Packet clearly says "Smoking is Injurious to Health" last time I had seen in one such packet...maybe the wordings might have changed but then it means the same.
We need to inspire each other to do what is good and only then we will the best in each other and the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE.
What a Comparison? and for What & Why?
But then it's a Personal Choice.
But then look at our Population - We will be No.1 Soon & Very Soon.
Statutary Warning on the Cigratte Packet clearly says "Smoking is Injurious to Health" last time I had seen in one such packet...maybe the wordings might have changed but then it means the same.
We need to inspire each other to do what is good and only then we will the best in each other and the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE.
AMRUTH replied to: Major Retd Rebbapragada
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

30: Well said Amruth. We cannot compare Vasectomy
and smoking. The two have entirely different
concepts. Smoking is injurious to one's
health and also it is a hazard to non-smokers
also (passive smoking). So, it should be
stopped and everybody should be guided
properly to come through this very critical
issue. Mr. Ramesh says that he himself is a
victim of smoking and he has shown the
benefits and enthusiasm he received after
quitting it. Smoking is a real hazard (even
alcoholism does not since it only affects the
body of the person who consume it). Throw the
packets (not empty) away.
Sudhakaran replied to: AMRUTH
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
31: I appreciate Mr Ramesh for this hike
proposal. Becuase, one way he is tiding the
people from smoking for atleast 9 hours in
the office and taking back his 10 percentage
hike in terms of extra production time by
tiding the smokers in their chair fully. Well
done and Congrats Mr.Ramesh!
Non-smokers, please do not pay ur attention to this hike proposal as it's only a medicine to the deceased person.
Non-smokers, please do not pay ur attention to this hike proposal as it's only a medicine to the deceased person.
Posted by: Ranganathan - 30 Dec, 2009
34: The good motive of the man is deserved to be
highly appreciated. Whatever consequences
there are with his employees, his intention
is right - to show a good lifestyle. I have
seen different comments including negative
ones, but let us pay full marks to his
intention. He not only guides his people in
the right path, but also shows the right path
to the Nation. We can expect more from such
individuals or companies including the case
of alcohol, drugs, etc. Afterall, this is a
perfect example of how a leader can lead his
team.
Posted by: Sudhakaran - 30 Dec, 2009

35:Its a good encouragement. I was a smoker for
23 years and have quit smoking using chewing
gums and strong will power. Any one can do
that! and enjoy the benefits of quitting
smoking.
srinivas tadikonda replied to: Sudhakaran
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
36: This is not at all a correct move! What's the
reward for the people who does not smoke?
They are missing 10% hike only because they
don't smoke! What a joke! Also, if someone
wants to smoke then he/she has to realize the
ill effects of smoking and then only they can
quit it. 10% hike is not going to help at all
. Mr. Ramesh please think twice . try to
motivate your people with examples not with
money.
Posted by: SDutta - 30 Dec, 2009

37:money is thicker than blood.i have a team who
understands that the hike is the medicine for
smokers so that they can be together for many
years
ramesh replied to: SDutta
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

38:Dear Mr.Dutta, You are not doing anything.
Atleast stop criticisng what others do.
Adding to the salary hike, you
can advice to motivate the people in other maner also
can advice to motivate the people in other maner also
R K Gupta replied to: SDutta
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

39:When u talk in terms of money, it is not just
10% hike. But also savings of the expenditure
u are putting towards cost of cigarettes,
expenses towards afer effects of the same and
above all avoding the effect of passive
smoking.
IN my view what Mr Ramesh initiated to do need not be viewed back. Ofcourse motivation is required for any task.
IN my view what Mr Ramesh initiated to do need not be viewed back. Ofcourse motivation is required for any task.
S.Kameswara Sarma replied to: SDutta
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
40: i am also smoking . but right now i am not
smokong . i am smoking Last 6 Years .
Posted by: pinal patel - 30 Dec, 2009
42: your approach is right but those who r not
in habit of smoking if they start smoking and
drinking and then they quit because of salary
hike then what will u do.
Posted by: prateek paneri - 30 Dec, 2009

43:it shows their personality affecting their
growth
A C Ramesh replied to: prateek paneri
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

44:If u want to find shortcuts for earnings, yes
it is correct. But in my openion it should be
" if a non smoker starts smoking afterwards
he rather than being offered 10% hike for
quitting the same magnitude need to be cut
from his pay pack". The drive is intended for
converting smokers as non smokers, but not a
short cut for earnings.
S.kameswara Sarma replied to: prateek paneri
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

45:you r absolutely right. but as per my concern
no need of giving extra hikes if they quit
smoking and drinking they can save 10% of
there basic
varma replied to: prateek paneri
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
46: monetary lure for change of behaviour is not
welcome. As a rewards professional, i can
suggest that this is a short sighted
decision. A mere example set by Mr. Ramesh is
enough for the real change and people with
integrity would follow suit. People who donot
believe in it would get 10% hike and end up
smoking in the streets and home.
Posted by: George Varghese - 30 Dec, 2009
49: Well its a good idea,isit not?It will turn to
be a good practice only once it is made
mandatory.Today we see corporate invest a lot
of money on employees health to keep them fit
in the work place.Practices like the one
above will see it growth only whtn it is
supplemented by some consideration.
Posted by: B.Ramakrishna - 30 Dec, 2009
50: I don't smoke or drink .So how much can I
expect? lol
Posted by: Arulprakash Ravindran - 30 Dec, 2009

51:hey great that u dont smoke or drink...but
think like it acts like a medicine to ppl who
do smoke and drink....nd dont hold
grudges.....
A C Ramesh replied to: Arulprakash Ravindran
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

52:how u quit ur smoking... suddenly or slowly?
venkatesh replied to: Arulprakash Ravindran
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

53: i was never a serious smoker...i used to
smoke during drinks...so i decided to remove
the root cause by quitting drinking...
A C Ramesh replied to: venkatesh
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
54: Then what about Women employees?(only
regarding the hike of women employees I asked
this one)
It is utter waste decision... You can not change those people(smokers).
U can stop them to smoke at workstation only maximum 9 hours and wat about rest of the day... if they control that particular hour will not bring any change at all. They have more curiosity to smoke apart from the working hours... I think it is not a good idea. See if it comes to exist... everyone will get 10% hike... but we cant stop the smoking habit. Meanwhile, that too hike the selling rate of Cigarettes.
It is utter waste decision... You can not change those people(smokers).
U can stop them to smoke at workstation only maximum 9 hours and wat about rest of the day... if they control that particular hour will not bring any change at all. They have more curiosity to smoke apart from the working hours... I think it is not a good idea. See if it comes to exist... everyone will get 10% hike... but we cant stop the smoking habit. Meanwhile, that too hike the selling rate of Cigarettes.
Posted by: Lakshmi - 30 Dec, 2009

55:Dear Madam,
Every person shall consume 1/3 of his life in sleeping, 1/3 for his family life and 1/3 for earnings/lively hood. THis was told by many eminent personolities in the world. Sleeping period any how he can't smoke. Earning period his boss is controlling. Why the remaining period of 1/3 can't be? Where there is a will, there is a way too
Every person shall consume 1/3 of his life in sleeping, 1/3 for his family life and 1/3 for earnings/lively hood. THis was told by many eminent personolities in the world. Sleeping period any how he can't smoke. Earning period his boss is controlling. Why the remaining period of 1/3 can't be? Where there is a will, there is a way too
S.Kameswara Sarma replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

56:After duty hours its the duty of the wife to
compel her husband to stop smoking
Sanoj Nambiar replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

57:yes u r right but every body try then one day
we will achive the goal madam
sanjay replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

58:Dear Lakshmi, Try to think the other way
around. when people can quit for 9 hrs they
will surely think of leaving it... My
personal experience, i work in office where i
dont get place to smoke by stoppinmg my self
for 9 hrs i dint feel like smoking after
office hrs...for me something is better than
nothing...
Vijay Patil replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

59:Gr8 movement by org
Every smoker want to quite smoking but due to getting chance in office area, he can't. So if the person can quit the smoking for 9 WORKING hrs then himself will feel good and a better chance to quite.
And its not abt the hike, its abt to quit the smoking.
Every smoker want to quite smoking but due to getting chance in office area, he can't. So if the person can quit the smoking for 9 WORKING hrs then himself will feel good and a better chance to quite.
And its not abt the hike, its abt to quit the smoking.
Mahesh replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

60:COOL..MS.LAKSHMI. LET US ANNOUNCE INCENTIVE
FOR WOMEN WHO DOESN'T ASK SILK SAREES TO
HUSBANDS.. OK?
RANGANATHAN replied to: Lakshmi
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

61: HAHAHA this one was good one Ranganathan:)
Vinod replied to: RANGANATHAN
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

62: LOL mr. Ranganathan. Good job. Ms Lakshmi do
you have any better solution than please
propose it here instead of abusing those who
are doing their bit to control this problem.
rdx1312 replied to: RANGANATHAN
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

63: gud one
this is true it is just to get ride of smoke nor it is a matter of hike.....
keep it up Mr. RANGANATHAN.
i really appreciate ur answer..
this is true it is just to get ride of smoke nor it is a matter of hike.....
keep it up Mr. RANGANATHAN.
i really appreciate ur answer..
Varun replied to: rdx1312
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
64: Its so nice to hear that some one taking good
steps to keep latest their happy and healthy.
But still its is up to people to follow this.
If one person follows and get hike/bonus
whatever, I guess it will inspire others to
follow. Let us keep posted how its working in
the company.
Posted by: Ane - 30 Dec, 2009
66: Well thats interesting. But would there be
any additional hike if a professional doesnt
Drink or Smoke ? How would that be ?
Posted by: NoBooze_NoSmoke - 30 Dec, 2009
67: i gonnu quite this nasty crap... i gonnu have
10% bonus on ma basics... yaaa hooo...
Posted by: udupa - 30 Dec, 2009
68: A better try for a Healthy man kind. Now
people will feel bad, if they where not
Smokers.. Like Me..
Posted by: Sparsha - 30 Dec, 2009

69:Do one thing you start smoking and quit it,
then you will not feel bad
sanoj nambiar replied to: Sparsha
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
70: its a good innovative idea for avoiding
smoking of employes,it will definetly work as
there sould be certain laws made on these
basis.
Posted by: Atul deshmukh - 30 Dec, 2009
72: Me sorry to say that this will not work.one
should quit smoking only when he/she feel
that he/she should quit this...
Bad Idea Boss..try some other trick..
Bad Idea Boss..try some other trick..
Posted by: Ranjeet Kumar - 30 Dec, 2009
74: Its a nice idea. I think big gaints in the
industry need to apply the same startegy (but
need to think about non-Smokers also)
Posted by: Vasan.k - 30 Dec, 2009
75: Unique thinking, at the same time, the
non-smokers are also should be paid for their
non-smoking habit. Because, unlike smokers
they have been spending their smoking time on
production right? (Smoking time of one
cigarette is approximately 5 to 6 minutes...
calculate time for 10, 20 cigarettes per day)
Posted by: Ranganathan - 30 Dec, 2009

76:hey!ultimately non smokers are benefitted wen
the companies profit grows up due to
increased efficiency f employees..
A C Ramesh replied to: Ranganathan
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
77: Good, Noble thought but will upset the comp
band if the hike will be on the base pay.
Also, people who are non-smokers will be at
loss and people are sensitive when it comes
to money. I dont think they should touch
organisation comp bands. They should
introduce other reward mechanisms. How will
it be implemented? People might consider
taking up smikin and then quitting to get a
pay hike in a market like this....
Posted by: Vikram - 30 Dec, 2009
78: Its a nice move. If it can make at least one
employee to quit smoking, that is enough. The
company saved one life there which is a great
thing. I was a smoker and I lived in
Bangalore for around three years, smoking.
At that time government introduced a new rule
and put fine on people smoking in public. But
when I smoke hiding behind a bus waiting shed
in shivaji Nagar Bus stand, the policemen
came and ask for me for lighter. Because they
don't carry them and they gave me a good
company always while smoking. I am no more a
smoker now. I quit and I feel the difference
now.I was inspired from films and celebrities
for smoking. 99 percent of the Indian smokers
will have the same. So what about the rest
one percent? They get from parents. I request
all the smokers to quit. "PLEASE DO NOT
INSPIRE THE YOUNG GENERATION FOR SMOKING!"
Posted by: sudi - 29 Dec, 2009
79: It should se reverse........"Employees who
are non smokers will get hike", then smokers
will think about quiting
Posted by: Amit - 29 Dec, 2009

80:i appreciate the suggestion..will think about
it...
A C Ramesh replied to: Amit
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

81:great ,however its extra burden on management
if non-smoker count is more.
Instead of it : great idea is decrease smokers pay by 10% :(
Instead of it : great idea is decrease smokers pay by 10% :(
chetanM replied to: Amit
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

82:Really this idea is the best way to motivate
the smokers. This idea not only creates a
healthy workforce but also a good movement
against GLOBAL WARMING.
Chitta Ranjan Rout replied to: Amit
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

83: A few twigs of cigerates will reduce the
global warming rate... LOL.....
A better option would be to tell your boss to swith office the A.c in the office for 1 hr daily. It will have better impact.
A better option would be to tell your boss to swith office the A.c in the office for 1 hr daily. It will have better impact.
Anoop replied to: Chitta Ranjan Rout
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
85: gr8....it will work out...atleast 80% of
persons with gud health
Posted by: pragash - 29 Dec, 2009

86:great i will quit smoking for getting hike ,
but then i will start drinking..LOLZ..
This idea is cool but sounds nonstrategic and stupendous.
This idea is cool but sounds nonstrategic and stupendous.
Smruti replied to: pragash
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
87: This is the funniest article I have read on
SI. Appreciate the concern of Ramesh for his
employees but don't you think that this is a
form of discrimination? And yes as many have
said in their earlier posts what about the
non-smokers? The hike offered to the
employees for quiting will cause motivational
differences amongst them.
And as rightly said "Why one has to incentivise or force some one to take care of their damn health? Its a different issue if they are illiterates." Smoking is a habit cultivated by years one cannot give up smoking instantly - there are organizations that facilitate the same.
And as rightly said "Why one has to incentivise or force some one to take care of their damn health? Its a different issue if they are illiterates." Smoking is a habit cultivated by years one cannot give up smoking instantly - there are organizations that facilitate the same.
Posted by: Thebarracuda - 29 Dec, 2009

88:Some people are born negative they refuse to
see good in any thing.
sainee replied to: Thebarracuda
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
89: Great job man... Why not also apply the same
rule on quitting drinking...
Posted by: Mustafa Kamal - 29 Dec, 2009

90:Hi,
This is ridiculous.....
This is ridiculous.....
Mohamed replied to: Mustafa Kamal
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
91: It is a good start for the coming year.
Posted by: Ankush Singhal - 29 Dec, 2009
92: Gr8 innovative way to motivate employees...a
perfect example for 'working right while
staying fit'...All the best:))
Posted by: rajshree - 29 Dec, 2009
93: I am agree with this .It should be avoided
.Ans stricted by any ways.
Posted by: Ajjay upadhyaya - 29 Dec, 2009
94: Oh and I thought smoking in company premises
or within office walls is not permitted by
law since a few months.
Posted by: Antony - 29 Dec, 2009
95: Great now the non smokers are also gonna
start smoking to avail this offer! Remember
Work is God n Health is Wealth
Posted by: Gods must be crazy - 29 Dec, 2009
96: Quite smoking in the office or completely?
Now they need a certification agency to
certify this (wink)... Moreover what to the
people who don't smoke?
As it is said "Quit smoking is easy... I have done many times" ... Great Idea, But......
As it is said "Quit smoking is easy... I have done many times" ... Great Idea, But......
Posted by: Debabrata - 29 Dec, 2009
97: I would go with reverse logic.I dont smoke.
To get a hike, i wud start the habit and
quit. (An Idea Can Change Your Life)
Posted by: Agi - 29 Dec, 2009

98:these acts lead to expose ones true
personality and they urge for money.
A C Ramesh replied to: Agi
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

99:That's really a nice idea for non-smokers :).
No one gets offended.
Antony replied to: Agi
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
101: for smokers pay hike may sometimes look
meaningless as they need to leav smoking.
But a good initiative atleast.
But a good initiative atleast.
Posted by: shruti - 29 Dec, 2009
102: who is judge ? and how it can be measured
?
I would like to mention here is that many of my freinds quit smoking for one ot two days, max 15 day.
ha one freind quit it completely because his girl freind,,,
I would like to mention here is that many of my freinds quit smoking for one ot two days, max 15 day.
ha one freind quit it completely because his girl freind,,,
Posted by: Baswaraj - 29 Dec, 2009
103: Why one has to incentivise or force some one
to take care of their damn health? Its a
different issue if they are illiterates.
What a pitty! we have to teach the learned.
What a pitty! we have to teach the learned.
Posted by: Harsh - 29 Dec, 2009

104:It is not a question of literate. It is the
matter of addiction. If any ban coming to a
process, then it will accept by people. Any
way Very good start. People who has a
willingness to stop but can't due to
addiction can surely quit this bad habbit.
The central Govt once brought this idea, but
by the state governments neglect this because
of sales tax.
Rojilal replied to: Harsh
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
105: This is good Idea, All organization should
adopt this.
Posted by: Manjuanth - 29 Dec, 2009
109: Aa narated by Hassan Raza, there is every
possibility of Cheating by the employee, but
at least this idea will reduce smoking.
Posted by: Gowtham - 29 Dec, 2009
110: Really appreciable step.Hope employees make
proper use of it.
Posted by: Suparna - 29 Dec, 2009
111: This is very good idea developed by Higher
Authority person. But Employee might cheat to
the Co person that he left the smoking habbit
to get hike in the Salary. He can start
smoking at home or after somedays.........
Thanks
Hasan Raza
Thanks
Hasan Raza
Posted by: Hasan Raza - 29 Dec, 2009
112: That's really a appreciable move... one more
thing need to be taken into consideration why
government is so obsessive about
manufacturing such a suicidal element...
that's need to be shut!
Posted by: Muniraj - 29 Dec, 2009
113: Then what about Women employees?(only
regarding the hike of women employees I asked
this one)
It is utter waste decision... You can not change those people(smokers).
U can stop them to smoke at workstation only maximum 9 hours and wat about rest of the day... if they control that particular hour will not bring any change at all. They have more curiosity to smoke apart from the working hours... I think it is not a good idea. See if it comes to exist... everyone will get 10% hike... but we cant stop the smoking habit. Meanwhile, that too hike the selling rate of Cigarettes.
It is utter waste decision... You can not change those people(smokers).
U can stop them to smoke at workstation only maximum 9 hours and wat about rest of the day... if they control that particular hour will not bring any change at all. They have more curiosity to smoke apart from the working hours... I think it is not a good idea. See if it comes to exist... everyone will get 10% hike... but we cant stop the smoking habit. Meanwhile, that too hike the selling rate of Cigarettes.
Posted by: Lakshmi - 29 Dec, 2009

114:Actually Why do u think that we can not
change those people?
See as one strict ban coming, people are forced to accept this.
After all, if one man smoke one cigerett, the poisonous effect persist in his body more than 30 days. So we can measure him if he did smoke or not.
See as one strict ban coming, people are forced to accept this.
After all, if one man smoke one cigerett, the poisonous effect persist in his body more than 30 days. So we can measure him if he did smoke or not.
Rojilal replied to: Lakshmi
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

115:Hey, Try to give the better solution to stop
ppl from smoking instead of condemning
ramesh's idea. He is doing something better
compared to other companies if we consider
the employees' health prospects. Your
analysis is right, but please try to find out
the solution... I think doing Yoga, taking
employees on health awareness camps etc.
might help better... or else inaddition to
ramesh's idea, he can ensure the 10% hike
according the the doctor's report on their
lungs and liver condition... Just think..
KISHORE replied to: Lakshmi
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

116: Hi, I do agree with you coming out this type
of solutions no way will help employee to
stop smoking there is always back door to do
anything.
Yoga, Push ups, free hand exercise and breathing exercise keeps in good health with this by doing household work like sweeping, swabing, washing clothes etc., also keeps in good health.
One must have self control and limit for bad habits.
Hope I am not wrong .... Ganesh
Yoga, Push ups, free hand exercise and breathing exercise keeps in good health with this by doing household work like sweeping, swabing, washing clothes etc., also keeps in good health.
One must have self control and limit for bad habits.
Hope I am not wrong .... Ganesh
Ganesh replied to: KISHORE
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

117:At least one step has been taken.We should
not
discourage positive moves.What's wrong if 8 or
more hours gone without smoking.one must not
think negative.The comment is very good.but
asks for a drastic change
discourage positive moves.What's wrong if 8 or
more hours gone without smoking.one must not
think negative.The comment is very good.but
asks for a drastic change
jagdamba prasad replied to: Lakshmi
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

118: Yes u r corret jagdamba... one should be
positive. its a nice idea. at least it will
change the life for 9 hours...
mitul replied to: jagdamba prasad
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
119: Pure marketing Gimic,, nothing good about
this, This way they are propogating
smokking,, ppl would join them as smokers,
and then they would say,, we will quit,, give
us a Hike,,
so every year,, u get 10% hike for quitting smoking, then drinking, then many other things,,
Guys,, if u wanna do something, do something constructive,, follow those Bangalore guys who have switched to cycling,, this way u will have better health,, u would leave smoking,, and u will save money,,
Take a wise decision,,
so every year,, u get 10% hike for quitting smoking, then drinking, then many other things,,
Guys,, if u wanna do something, do something constructive,, follow those Bangalore guys who have switched to cycling,, this way u will have better health,, u would leave smoking,, and u will save money,,
Take a wise decision,,
Posted by: Manoj - 29 Dec, 2009

120:just so u know,how can it be a marketing
gimmick wen we are losing money by making dis
move..and it is for existing employees.and
the new employees taken wil be motivated to
quit to fulfil of making my ambition of
making focus a tobacco free company.
A C Ramesh replied to: Manoj
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
121: This is a very good practise which should be
carried in all the organizations at all
levels. I strongly believe in what Mr. Ramesh
is saying "Employee's health is company's
health". Keep it up and very nice iniciative.
Posted by: Amol - 29 Dec, 2009

123:This is a good idea. But time should be given
for quiting smoking habbit and it should be
start from the Management side than employees
will automatecally adopt the same.
J. K. Wadhwa replied to: Amol
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009
124: Smoking has multipls effect on health. So no
one shd get addicted to this habit. I have an
NGO which has been propogating natural
healthy lifestyle among urbun youths. Please
check the links for more info
http://sharavathi.blogspot.com and
www.sharavathivalley.com
Sam
Sam
Posted by: Sam - 29 Dec, 2009
125: hey...its a good idea....but did anyone
thought about the drawbacks...
what if the employees fool the employer for higher pay.... they would lie that they had quit smokin.....right...
what if the employees fool the employer for higher pay.... they would lie that they had quit smokin.....right...
Posted by: Nilesh - 29 Dec, 2009

126:i like to think of myself as an intelligent
man who has enough to sense to know when
sumones telling the truth or not...and i
trust my employees
A C Ramesh replied to: Nilesh
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009
127: Good idea! Apart from hikes in pay, the
smoking category must also be educated the
hazardous of smoking. Just for the sake of
10% hike, it is not to be. All
Organizations, irrespective of the
product/service/activities, smoking habit
must be abandoned.
Posted by: sundar - 29 Dec, 2009
128: good idea, we will try to implement in our
organisation
Posted by: Vamsi - 29 Dec, 2009
129: what a fentastic idea it is
other companies also should follow.
other companies also should follow.
Posted by: dev - 29 Dec, 2009
130: Other corporates should take a lesson from
this. It may possible that it will improve
the efficiency and increase in pay leads to
employee satisfaction. Family members also
appreciates such thing.
Posted by: New Techies - 29 Dec, 2009
131: i really apreciate..i am engineering
student...
but really apreciate...nd agree with rajesh dat he should give sm award for thiss good kindness
but really apreciate...nd agree with rajesh dat he should give sm award for thiss good kindness
Posted by: akhilesh pathania - 29 Dec, 2009
133: I fully agreed with Sagarika comments that
CEO should be awarded by health minister.It
is great step towards health care of
indivisuals.
Posted by: Rajesh Tamak - 29 Dec, 2009
135: i think this CEO should be awarded by the
health ministry!
Posted by: sagarika - 29 Dec, 2009

137:It is good resolution for New year. Salute to
the CEO and He should give somthing like this
idea to the govt also.
Janardhan replied to: sagarika
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

138: What about the hike for the guys who already
are non-smokers :)
rakesh replied to: Janardhan
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

139: good idea.. atleast he could save lifes of
people from cancer by using this kind of
offers. I apriciate the initiative, becoz i
know how difficult to quit smoking untill
unless something happend to self.
Brahmam Lv replied to: rakesh
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

140: Good Thought....Really Appericated words from
Ramesh those who smoke's. So, get ready to
quit.
diwakar replied to: Brahmam Lv
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

141:I am smoking, but I am in Afghanistan how can
I particpate to quite smoking. I tried
several times, but did not sucess. I think it
is not easy.
Shahzad Aryobee replied to: diwakar
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

142:I do not agree this can stop the smoking.
even though it has been written on packet
statutory warning people generally ignore the
warning until they do not get error.
as i read earlier comments "great idea, people will start smoking and quit to get hike" (that show money could bring the bad habit easily into life ).
If people start to quit smoking that is already 10% hike for them as you may see how much people are wasting money.
so it should be in reverse order if some one caught smoking deduct 10% from salary. so no one will be agree and all blame will come to management and no one wants to do job in such kind of environment because the punishment is remain now a days on school children not on us (well educated illiterate person).
as i read earlier comments "great idea, people will start smoking and quit to get hike" (that show money could bring the bad habit easily into life ).
If people start to quit smoking that is already 10% hike for them as you may see how much people are wasting money.
so it should be in reverse order if some one caught smoking deduct 10% from salary. so no one will be agree and all blame will come to management and no one wants to do job in such kind of environment because the punishment is remain now a days on school children not on us (well educated illiterate person).
Praveen replied to: diwakar
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

143: Good one...! Very Innovative idea. Need to
see how far this will work out
Mallesh replied to: Praveen
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009

144: this is true mallesh let see how many work
out on this idea.
chirag replied to: Mallesh
post - 31 Dec, 2009
post - 31 Dec, 2009

145: Hi All,
Instead of giving 10% hike to people who quit smoking, which has a side effect of non-smokers feeling bad, could it be something like 10% hike to all non-smokers..?
if that is so, then smokers may quit for the sake of hike too... wats ur opinion..?
Instead of giving 10% hike to people who quit smoking, which has a side effect of non-smokers feeling bad, could it be something like 10% hike to all non-smokers..?
if that is so, then smokers may quit for the sake of hike too... wats ur opinion..?
Aarthi replied to: Mallesh
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

146: I support the resolution, but afraid of
implementation. An organization can not be a
constant watch dog for all the time to see if
its staffs are smoking elsewhere. Anyway, the
move is positive and is appreciated
henceforth. wait and see the real
implementation.
Supratim Basu replied to: Mallesh
post - 30 Dec, 2009
post - 30 Dec, 2009

147: it will turn non smokers to smokers.. for
getting a hike..
pankaj replied to: Mallesh
post - 29 Dec, 2009
post - 29 Dec, 2009
Disclaimer
Messages posted on this Web site under the `Comments' area are solely the opinions of those who have posted them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd or its site www.siliconindia.com. Gossip, mud slinging and malicious attacks on individuals and organizations are strictly prohibited. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd can not be held responsible for errors or omissions in content, nor for the authenticity of the user/company name or email addresses associated with posted messages. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd reserves the right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or any other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous,
or otherwise offensive or inappropriate.Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd do not endorse the products and services or any other offerings mentioned in these messages.
Recent posts from General news
- iPhone 4.0 to have multitasking
- Internet Explorer 9 goes for HTML5, partially
- PE firms invest $425 Million into Asian Genco
- Canadian universities line up for India
- Franklin Templeton announces tax-free dividend
- State-run banks can enter insurance business
- Illegal downloading wiping out jobs
- Videocon introduces 9 more mobile handsets
- Technology drives healthcare costs
- Candidates to be interviewed by alumni at IIM-B
- IIMs' high salary: The true story has a twist
- 22yr old Indian to solve cybercrimes @ mouse click
- Will foreign varsities poach IIT, IIM profs?
- Women MPs more successful, qualified than men
- Aircel launches a Qwerty handset for Rs. 2,999
- 10 most popular incentives that firms offer
- Approaching a VC? Here is a checklist
- 4,000 Infosys' employees resign last month: CLSA
- Cognizant announces bonuses up to 200 percent
- Top IT skills in demand


