Processing .....please wait.. 
The article has been forwarded.... 
News >> Technology >>
Profit per employee dips for IT firms
By agencies
|
Friday, 10 June 2005, 19:30 IST
CHENNAI: Top players continue to add significant numbers to their manpower strength, but the growth of those numbers has slowed significantly this year.
In absolute numbers, top players (the first five in addition to TCS, which upped its headcount by 10,871 to 45,714) had added 54,285 employees for the year ended March 2005, while the same players added 49,089 the previous year. But the percentage growth in manpower for these six companies slowed to about 30 percent between 2004 and 2005 compared to 62 percent between 2003 and 2004.
Interestingly, the more people they add, the less profit these companies seem to make per employee, save for Infosys and Wipro Technologies, both of which have seen a slight annual increase on this count. In other words, these companies need more people to realize the same amount of profit.
Figures for Wipro Technologies include its BPO arm's contributions, which are significant. The BPO business contributed to 11 percent of Wipro Tech's $1.35 billion revenues for the year. BPO employees numbered 15,673, which is more than a third of Wipro Tech's entire manpower count. Typically, a BPO operation requires greater investments in the early years of the business but could yield returns in the long run. This in user organizations. The top five companies along with TCS, currently employ close to a fifth of that strength and it could be one reason why operating profit per employee is lower for Wipro than for Infosys.
Significantly, the industry crossed the one-million-employee mark recently, including BPO and IT employees
In the backdrop of an increase in offshore projects (Infosys saw 52 percent of its revenues coming from offshore work compared to 47 percent the year before), a few aspects crave attention.
If operating profit per employee dips, it could suggest a drop in margins either due to lower billing rates or rising costs. It could also indicate that the return on net worth for offshore projects could be lower compared to onsite efforts. (Return on net worth here indicates profits as a proportion of amount invested.)
And, operating leverage for offshore projects is higher than for onsite projects is the final conclusion you could come to. (Here, operating leverage is the proportion of fixed costs to total costs. Since offshore projects typically require infrastructure investments, the proportion of fixed costs to total costs could be higher here, compared to onsite projects, which require little or no such investments.)
Satyam Computer, Mastek and Polaris saw some fall in operating profit per employee while HCL Technologies and Cognizant saw only a marginal fall. iGate Global Solutions' figures slumped between 2003 and 2004, but rose back a bit for the year ended March 2005.