Executives to no more enjoy hefty bonuses
By
SiliconIndia,Thursday, 30 October 2008, 04:49 Hrs
New York: Even as government is demanding deterrent policies from companies on the ground of questions over executive conduct or the accuracy of financial result, several U.S. firms are adopting measures to ban executives from keeping hefty bonuses. A new study by pay research firm Equilar finds that nearly two third of big U.S. companies have already taken such measures.
According to the study big corporations have voluntary adopted clawback policies that allow them to recoup portions of executive pay in the event of financial restatement, unethical conduct or other reasons.
The study also shows that 64.2 percent of the largest 95 publicly held companies in the Fortune 100 had disclosed clawback policies as of this year, up from 42.1 percent in 2007 and 17.6 percent in 2006.
Alexander Cwirko-Godycki, a research manager at Equilar and one of the study's authors said, "We are switching from a situation from where it was a toss-up as to whether a company would have a clawback policy to now, there is a clear consensus that clawbacks are a good corporate governance policy."
Lockheed Martin, Motorola and Hess are among the companies that have disclosed clawback policies this year, according to Redwood Shores, California-based Equilar.
The provisions vary from company to company. The study found that overall, clawback policies are becoming broader, applying to more types of conduct and covering more kinds of compensation that executives receive.
"The policies generally do not require CEOs and others to forfeit all their compensation. Instead, they target things like cash bonuses as well as stock options, restricted shares and shares granted for meeting various performance goals," Equilar said.
The study found that a handful of companies, including Pepsi also have extended clawback provisions to apply to outside directors on the board, not just company executives.
According to the study big corporations have voluntary adopted clawback policies that allow them to recoup portions of executive pay in the event of financial restatement, unethical conduct or other reasons.
The study also shows that 64.2 percent of the largest 95 publicly held companies in the Fortune 100 had disclosed clawback policies as of this year, up from 42.1 percent in 2007 and 17.6 percent in 2006.
Alexander Cwirko-Godycki, a research manager at Equilar and one of the study's authors said, "We are switching from a situation from where it was a toss-up as to whether a company would have a clawback policy to now, there is a clear consensus that clawbacks are a good corporate governance policy."
Lockheed Martin, Motorola and Hess are among the companies that have disclosed clawback policies this year, according to Redwood Shores, California-based Equilar.
The provisions vary from company to company. The study found that overall, clawback policies are becoming broader, applying to more types of conduct and covering more kinds of compensation that executives receive.
"The policies generally do not require CEOs and others to forfeit all their compensation. Instead, they target things like cash bonuses as well as stock options, restricted shares and shares granted for meeting various performance goals," Equilar said.
The study found that a handful of companies, including Pepsi also have extended clawback provisions to apply to outside directors on the board, not just company executives.
Don't Miss
Write your comment now
|
Submit your news/press release
Let our editorial department know about any news about your company, your
organization, or yourself, or any press release that you have. If we find it suitable for our audience, we will contact you and make a news. Please
also share any links for the news.
Reader's comments (2)
1: Isn't it that Companies are very proactive
with the recession. When Companies turn over
is more or they make more profits, do they
think of sharing that extra with her
Employees or is it only at the crisis
situation. Are Employees only their to share
losses or they are considered at the time of
profits also.
Anuradha
Manager HR
Anuradha
Manager HR
Posted by: Anuradha - 31 Oct, 2008
2: why only now? this step should have been
taken long back.
Posted by: ramanathan - 29 Oct, 2008
Disclaimer
Messages posted on this Web site under the `Comments' area are solely the opinions of those who have posted them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd or its site www.siliconindia.com. Gossip, mud slinging and malicious attacks on individuals and organizations are strictly prohibited. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd can not be held responsible for errors or omissions in content, nor for the authenticity of the user/company name or email addresses associated with posted messages. Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd reserves the right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or any other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous,
or otherwise offensive or inappropriate.Infoconnect Web Technologies India Pvt Ltd do not endorse the products and services or any other offerings mentioned in these messages.
- Software Testing is Dead!!!
- Why is Priyanka Gandhi Liked More than Rahul Gandhi?
- Selective Abortion on the Rise among Indians in North America
- Meet the Role Models of Indian Youth
- India's Most Wanted: Pak's Political Hero
- World's Greatest Introverts and Extroverts
- 5 Best Android Smartphones Under Rs.10,000
Beautiful and dress selection, please go to Dresses
| Plan on visiting the Lotus Temple? Get Great Deals on Delhi Hotels ! |
Buy India Wholesale Products on DHgate.com
SPOTLIGHT
US Indian
Two Indian Americans have been invited by the White House to brief US President Barack Obama o..