Can technology make or break a President?
By
siliconindia news bureau
Bangalore: Can technology make or break a president? There are evidences to prove 'yes'. Barack Obama just optimized the technology and explored the maximum possibility of it to beat his better financed and more entrenched opponent, Hilary Clinton, at least in party. Obama's campaign strategist, Axelrod, has built a system from the ground up that does something quite simple: It asks people for their help- help via vote or money.
While most of the campaign work is done by a few paid staffers without voters participation, the Obama campaign has built a community involvement strategy. Axelrod and his team realized that supporters of a political candidate are passionate and want to help. Though most supporters have full-time jobs and families, they all have five minutes to spare to help out. The Obama campaign has brilliantly taken advantage of this by actually asking people for help. They are letting a large number of people do a small amount of work each.
So if you go to an Obama rally (or just sign up on his Web site), you might be asked to call three voters in a swing state. Or if they know you are a member of Digg (the popular site that lets users vote on articles of interest), Obama's people may ask you to Digg an article that is favorable to Obama or critical of his opponent. Or they might ask you to put a bumper sticker on your MySpace (NWS) page.
Taking a look at history, one could see the visible presence of technology in American presidential elections. Franklin Delano Roosevelt used radio to get his message across effectively to voters. Lyndon Johnson rode a helicopter to get him around Texas in his famous race for the Senate.
John F Kennedy understood the power of television better than Richard Nixon during the race for the Presidency in 1960. And Republican operatives in the 1970s built direct mail into a fund-raising behemoth that powered party gains for 20 years.
The 1992 Clinton campaign understood advertising via cable television. Clinton's advisers realized that instead of expensive commercials on the networks, they could target a cable ad buy right down to a Zip Code. They built an extremely sophisticated procurement system to buy ads with the greatest impact. This was consequential: Clinton is the only two-term U.S. President who never received a majority of the vote, and one could argue that instrumental to his victory was his campaign's understanding of technology.
Today, all candidates for high political office follow the Clinton cable TV playbook. In 2004, tech use by George W. Bush's campaign defined his reelection. Bush's advisers, including Rove, invested in better ways to reach voters in heavily Democratic areas. Precincts in inner cities and certain suburbs have traditionally been 70 percent to 80 percent pro-Democrat; Republican candidates wouldn't even campaign there. But the Bush campaign honed microtargeting to reach people who voted infrequently and who might be open to their message.
While most of the campaign work is done by a few paid staffers without voters participation, the Obama campaign has built a community involvement strategy. Axelrod and his team realized that supporters of a political candidate are passionate and want to help. Though most supporters have full-time jobs and families, they all have five minutes to spare to help out. The Obama campaign has brilliantly taken advantage of this by actually asking people for help. They are letting a large number of people do a small amount of work each.
So if you go to an Obama rally (or just sign up on his Web site), you might be asked to call three voters in a swing state. Or if they know you are a member of Digg (the popular site that lets users vote on articles of interest), Obama's people may ask you to Digg an article that is favorable to Obama or critical of his opponent. Or they might ask you to put a bumper sticker on your MySpace (NWS) page.
Taking a look at history, one could see the visible presence of technology in American presidential elections. Franklin Delano Roosevelt used radio to get his message across effectively to voters. Lyndon Johnson rode a helicopter to get him around Texas in his famous race for the Senate.
John F Kennedy understood the power of television better than Richard Nixon during the race for the Presidency in 1960. And Republican operatives in the 1970s built direct mail into a fund-raising behemoth that powered party gains for 20 years.
The 1992 Clinton campaign understood advertising via cable television. Clinton's advisers realized that instead of expensive commercials on the networks, they could target a cable ad buy right down to a Zip Code. They built an extremely sophisticated procurement system to buy ads with the greatest impact. This was consequential: Clinton is the only two-term U.S. President who never received a majority of the vote, and one could argue that instrumental to his victory was his campaign's understanding of technology.
Today, all candidates for high political office follow the Clinton cable TV playbook. In 2004, tech use by George W. Bush's campaign defined his reelection. Bush's advisers, including Rove, invested in better ways to reach voters in heavily Democratic areas. Precincts in inner cities and certain suburbs have traditionally been 70 percent to 80 percent pro-Democrat; Republican candidates wouldn't even campaign there. But the Bush campaign honed microtargeting to reach people who voted infrequently and who might be open to their message.
Reader's comments(6)
1
Today's world is technology and obviously yes that technology can make or break
a president.
a president.
Posted by:
Parvathi
2
Today is the age of technology. If it can bring a small country like japan and
others on strategic position in world then it can certainly make a big change
over in politics whether it is in US or any other place. Mr Obama will certainly
gain success due to it.
Very soon in India as well we will see BJP n Congress having tech war during
election campaign!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cool what a picture it will be........
NT
others on strategic position in world then it can certainly make a big change
over in politics whether it is in US or any other place. Mr Obama will certainly
gain success due to it.
Very soon in India as well we will see BJP n Congress having tech war during
election campaign!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cool what a picture it will be........
NT
Posted by:
N Tiwari
3
Techcinal orientation along with an awarness of International politics was what
helped Kalam during his tenure at the RB... :) And it sure is good for the
country if we have someone who 'lives' in the present centuary leading us :)
helped Kalam during his tenure at the RB... :) And it sure is good for the
country if we have someone who 'lives' in the present centuary leading us :)
Posted by:
Thomas Sarasam
4
Yes. If a President of a State(Country) is a Tech savvy, then he/she would be in
a better person to implement new things rather getting the projects outsourced
to 3rd party. More over, in India also there were many gossips, like our next
President nominee may be Mr. Narayanamoorthy of Infosys. The same resembled
there. Its really very good to have Tech people to be in the
Apex/Acme position.
a better person to implement new things rather getting the projects outsourced
to 3rd party. More over, in India also there were many gossips, like our next
President nominee may be Mr. Narayanamoorthy of Infosys. The same resembled
there. Its really very good to have Tech people to be in the
Apex/Acme position.
Posted by:
Aravind D
5
In today's world technology plays an important role in each and every field. So,
Yes, technology make or break a president.
Yes, technology make or break a president.
Posted by:
Ivo Oscar Faleiro
6
well this is a good showdown of how advantages can be taken of the ever
expanding IT sect.
expanding IT sect.
Posted by:
pooja
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Deccan Mujahideen email threatens Delhi
- UK's work-permit norms to affect Indian IT staff
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Inflation will moderate: Chidambaram
- Karnataka firms seek licence for modern weapons
- Taj hotel premises handed back to Tata group
- Air India cuts fares on all domestic routes
- Inflation will moderate: Chidambaram
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Mumbai terror: IT clients cancel Bangalore visits
- 'Terrorists have no religion; politicians, act responsibly'
- 'Mumbai terror strikes meant to hit Indian economy'
- Online social media comes alive during Mumbai attacks
- MNCs pay more to Indian staff
- Future CEOs may emerge from HR departments
- 'IT industry raised India's international image'
- Former PM V.P. Singh, the Mandal messiah, dies
- Bad bosses can give heart attacks to men




