Linking revenue growth to headcount increase not correct
By
siliconindia news bureau
New Delhi:The conventional offshoring equation of linking revenue growth to headcount increase will not be a correct method of gauging an IT firm's progress, says a Forrester report. Many IT firms will shed up to 30 percent of their non-strategic current clients to pursue a more specialized strategy and rebuild competitiveness.
The report also warns financial analysts who continue to use outdated metrics such as, number of people added in the quarter as a measure of growth, as this actually encourages a 'body shopping' mindset in the tier II suppliers.
To meet stock market expectations, these firms continue picking up customer business all over the map in terms of skills, service lines, and industries served-ultimately lacking specialization or niche play.
Sudin Apte, senior analyst and author of the report said: "Polarisation between the offshore providers in India has accelerated. India's top three providers-Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Wipro-now drive almost half of India's total IT services exports by value."
The report titled "Surviving The Offshore Vendor Polarisation Puzzle" by Forrester states that many of these providers have added a huge army of new recruits in the past two years but unlike the top three players, these firms fail to grow revenue in proportion to the increase in headcount.
Cognizant, HCL, and Satyam still hold their ground and continue to grow, most non-specialized and undifferentiated tier II and tier III firms stand to lose because margin pressures do not allow them to invest enough in building specialization or take proactive initiatives to help clients ramp up.
The report predicts that in an all-out survival attempt, these firms will initiate a strategy overhaul and take steps such as divorcing non-strategic clients or shifting from a pure services play to an IP or solution accelerator proposition.
Apte cautions the financial analyst community tracking IT firms that they can no more rely on the conventional offshore equation; evidently linking revenue growth to the headcount growth.
The report also warns financial analysts who continue to use outdated metrics such as, number of people added in the quarter as a measure of growth, as this actually encourages a 'body shopping' mindset in the tier II suppliers.
To meet stock market expectations, these firms continue picking up customer business all over the map in terms of skills, service lines, and industries served-ultimately lacking specialization or niche play.
Sudin Apte, senior analyst and author of the report said: "Polarisation between the offshore providers in India has accelerated. India's top three providers-Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Wipro-now drive almost half of India's total IT services exports by value."
The report titled "Surviving The Offshore Vendor Polarisation Puzzle" by Forrester states that many of these providers have added a huge army of new recruits in the past two years but unlike the top three players, these firms fail to grow revenue in proportion to the increase in headcount.
Cognizant, HCL, and Satyam still hold their ground and continue to grow, most non-specialized and undifferentiated tier II and tier III firms stand to lose because margin pressures do not allow them to invest enough in building specialization or take proactive initiatives to help clients ramp up.
The report predicts that in an all-out survival attempt, these firms will initiate a strategy overhaul and take steps such as divorcing non-strategic clients or shifting from a pure services play to an IP or solution accelerator proposition.
Apte cautions the financial analyst community tracking IT firms that they can no more rely on the conventional offshore equation; evidently linking revenue growth to the headcount growth.
Reader's comments(3)
1: I neither support nor withdraw from
Forrester's analysis. Until recently, for any
team or company, headcount was a measure of
growth, and obvious reason being, more the
headcount, more are the man hours available
for delivery. There is a cause why a company
would scale up the headcount, from my
experiences as a part of strategy teams, I
understand that its delivery requirement
driven rather than just numbers. It would
still be a practice in teams and startups to
measure growth with the headcount increase !
Posted by: Abhi - 12:00 AM Aug 19, ' 08
2: changes are the only thing constant.. so go
ahead , it is a part of the flow.
Posted by: divya - 12:00 AM Aug 19, ' 08
3: of course they need to shift their strategy.
Hope these strategies will work.
Posted by: Suhan - 12:00 AM Aug 19, ' 08
- India loses six lakh jobs in four months
- 80 Stocks in BSE tremble, due to 'Tech snag'
- Air India backtracks, won't pay salaries on July 3
- India's 'dream budget' is unlikely to materialise
- Australian coroners fake info on Indian deaths
- Banks should alert customers after transaction: RBI
- Venkatramani to head Cognizant's India operations
- NASSCOM urges to restructure education loan
- 58 Million job generation in India expected till 2012
- Industrial recovery underway: Economic Survey
- Nilekani quits Infy, moves to Cabinet
- American tech grads are unemployable: HCL CEO
- India reply to Obama's 'No Bangalore' policy
- India opens the gates of its first sea bridge
- HCL outbids IBM, grabs U.S. firm's deal
- Obama gets tougher; firms look to move out of U.S.
- 'Missile Woman of India' to lead Agni V project
- Five Indian banks among world's top 1000
- Bangalore most difficult city for startups
- U.S. companies move work onshore





