Insurance firm must pay despite breach of conditions: court
By
IANS
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ruled that the owner of a vehicle, plying it as a taxi flouting an insurance condition, will still be entitled to 75 percent of the insured sum on its theft or carjacking.
A bench of Justice Tarun Chatterjee and Justice Dalveer Bhandari gave the ruling, upholding a September 2006 verdict of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The bench held that an insurance company was under obligation to indemnify the insurer for the theft of a vehicle, even if there was a breach of conditions of insurance. The ruling was given Thursday but released later.
"In the case of theft of a vehicle, breach of condition is not germane. The insurance company is liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle when the insurer has obtained comprehensive policy for the loss,? the bench ruled.
The apex court gave the verdict while dismissing an appeal by the National Insurance Company against the consumer court which ordered it to pay 75 percent of the insured amount to Nitin Khandelwal, a resident of Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh.
Khandelwal had lost his vehicle, a Mahindra Scorpio bought in May 2003, in a carjacking incident en route to Jaipur in September.
When he lodged the claim for the insured sum, the insurance company dismissed it, saying he had been using the vehicle as taxi and flouted the conditions of insurance.
Though the Gwalior District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum upheld the insurance company's contention, the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Forum on an appeal from Khandelwal directed it to pay 75 percent of the insured amount to the claimant.
A bench of Justice Tarun Chatterjee and Justice Dalveer Bhandari gave the ruling, upholding a September 2006 verdict of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The bench held that an insurance company was under obligation to indemnify the insurer for the theft of a vehicle, even if there was a breach of conditions of insurance. The ruling was given Thursday but released later.
"In the case of theft of a vehicle, breach of condition is not germane. The insurance company is liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle when the insurer has obtained comprehensive policy for the loss,? the bench ruled.
The apex court gave the verdict while dismissing an appeal by the National Insurance Company against the consumer court which ordered it to pay 75 percent of the insured amount to Nitin Khandelwal, a resident of Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh.
Khandelwal had lost his vehicle, a Mahindra Scorpio bought in May 2003, in a carjacking incident en route to Jaipur in September.
When he lodged the claim for the insured sum, the insurance company dismissed it, saying he had been using the vehicle as taxi and flouted the conditions of insurance.
Though the Gwalior District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum upheld the insurance company's contention, the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Forum on an appeal from Khandelwal directed it to pay 75 percent of the insured amount to the claimant.
- Firms now resort to legal help for lay-offs
- India ranks fourth among top ten internet users
- Mumbai attack to hit business visits from U.S.
- FIIs pull out 77 percent of last year's investment
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Bangalore IT firms offer help to combat terror
- India ranks tenth in spam generation list
- Time to show we are Indians first: PM
- Students protest Wipro recruitment in West Bengal
- TCS focuses SME sector to offer ITaaS
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Mumbai terror: IT clients cancel Bangalore visits
- 'Terrorists have no religion', Aamir Khan
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Online media comes alive during Mumbai attacks
- Karnataka firms seek licence for modern weapons
- Deccan Mujahideen email threatens Delhi
- MNCs pay more to Indian staff
- Future CEOs may emerge from HR departments
- 'IT industry raised India's international image'




