U.S. points to India, China for oil price hike too
By
IANS
Washington: White House has pointed a finger at India and China for the spike in oil prices even as it sought to clarify President George Bush's remark about Indian middle class contributing to rising food costs.
A presidential spokesman Monday also stuck to its guns on bio-fuels asserting that US policy of promoting corn-based ethanol in motor fuel supplies was having only a "small impact" on world food prices.
"I would point out that obviously the demand for oil is growing around the world," spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters when asked to comment on oil price hitting a record $120 a barrel Monday."Many developing nations like India or China are having greatly increased demand, which obviously is having an impact on price," he said.
Asked to clarify Bush's remark last week that growing prosperity of India's large middle class is contributing to rising food prices around the world, Stanzel said: "I can certainly clarify that. We think it is a good thing that countries are developing, that more and more people have higher and higher standards of living."
"The point I think that was to be made is that as you increase your standard of living, the food that you eat - it can venture more into meats that require more commodities to feed the livestock, which uses more of those commodities, whether it's corn or wheat or other commodities, and it drives up the price," he said.
"So that is just a function of how those food prices that we've seen spike in the... around the world."
But reacting to the retort from Indian politicians that that US policy of promoting corn-based ethanol has had a bigger impact on world food prices, he said food prices rose about 43 percent over the last year. "Of that portion, an increase in the biofuel production, about 1.5 percent of that, is due to an increase in biofuel production."
"The other majority, vast majority of that, is due to things like increased demand, like you were talking about, or increased energy prices, or weather-related problems in Australia or in Eastern Europe - problems with wheat production, as an example - that's driving up the price of those commodities.
"So the fact that we are making more biofuels so we reduce our dependence on foreign energy has an impact, but we believe it is a small impact," Stanzel said.
"... actually, it's the view of the economic advisors that the impact of biofuel production on food price will diminish over time."
Stanzel said a law signed by Bush in December regarding energy put a cap of 15 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol that the US can produce.
Bush's remarks on Indian middle class had touched off a furore in India with political parties across the spectrum making critical comments and Defence Minister A.K. Antony describing them as a "cruel joke".
Noting that the US is importing about 12 million barrels of oil per day, Stanzel said the record oil price was "another example that it's important for the United States to become less dependent on foreign sources of energy."
A presidential spokesman Monday also stuck to its guns on bio-fuels asserting that US policy of promoting corn-based ethanol in motor fuel supplies was having only a "small impact" on world food prices.
"I would point out that obviously the demand for oil is growing around the world," spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters when asked to comment on oil price hitting a record $120 a barrel Monday."Many developing nations like India or China are having greatly increased demand, which obviously is having an impact on price," he said.
Asked to clarify Bush's remark last week that growing prosperity of India's large middle class is contributing to rising food prices around the world, Stanzel said: "I can certainly clarify that. We think it is a good thing that countries are developing, that more and more people have higher and higher standards of living."
"The point I think that was to be made is that as you increase your standard of living, the food that you eat - it can venture more into meats that require more commodities to feed the livestock, which uses more of those commodities, whether it's corn or wheat or other commodities, and it drives up the price," he said.
"So that is just a function of how those food prices that we've seen spike in the... around the world."
But reacting to the retort from Indian politicians that that US policy of promoting corn-based ethanol has had a bigger impact on world food prices, he said food prices rose about 43 percent over the last year. "Of that portion, an increase in the biofuel production, about 1.5 percent of that, is due to an increase in biofuel production."
"The other majority, vast majority of that, is due to things like increased demand, like you were talking about, or increased energy prices, or weather-related problems in Australia or in Eastern Europe - problems with wheat production, as an example - that's driving up the price of those commodities.
"So the fact that we are making more biofuels so we reduce our dependence on foreign energy has an impact, but we believe it is a small impact," Stanzel said.
"... actually, it's the view of the economic advisors that the impact of biofuel production on food price will diminish over time."
Stanzel said a law signed by Bush in December regarding energy put a cap of 15 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol that the US can produce.
Bush's remarks on Indian middle class had touched off a furore in India with political parties across the spectrum making critical comments and Defence Minister A.K. Antony describing them as a "cruel joke".
Noting that the US is importing about 12 million barrels of oil per day, Stanzel said the record oil price was "another example that it's important for the United States to become less dependent on foreign sources of energy."
Reader's comments(6)
1
It is very easy to blame others when their own house is on fire and are
searching for water. It seems they are jealous of other countries prospering and
theirs no more.
Why Mr President of USA cannot break cartel of OPEC,does he have guts or courage
to do so? They have invaded Iraq and why they can't increase production to break
cartel. Why USA along with other countries who are oil producing oil use the
same yardstick to OPEC by whatever they are importing form cartel while
exporting to OPEC?
Instead of blaming India & China would it not be proper for countries like
USA,UK, and others to increase oil production?
searching for water. It seems they are jealous of other countries prospering and
theirs no more.
Why Mr President of USA cannot break cartel of OPEC,does he have guts or courage
to do so? They have invaded Iraq and why they can't increase production to break
cartel. Why USA along with other countries who are oil producing oil use the
same yardstick to OPEC by whatever they are importing form cartel while
exporting to OPEC?
Instead of blaming India & China would it not be proper for countries like
USA,UK, and others to increase oil production?
Posted by:
Jagdish M Shethia
2
I don't know, why people are so skeptic against US. They are happy about India
progressing. Besides, it's law of economics whatever they have mentioned. So
take it in a positive manner, rather than cryling like little babes.It's
shameful to see politicians making hue and cry over such a matter instead of
improving the farming conditions to export rather than import though India is an
agricultural country, thereby diverting their mistakes
progressing. Besides, it's law of economics whatever they have mentioned. So
take it in a positive manner, rather than cryling like little babes.It's
shameful to see politicians making hue and cry over such a matter instead of
improving the farming conditions to export rather than import though India is an
agricultural country, thereby diverting their mistakes
Posted by:
Abeesh
3
This is ridiculous comment made by white house and there is lot of resources in
india, we as a agricultural country we are consumming our own grains from our
ground.
You fought with all other country and make the oil price go up and finally
diverting the issue to india for food price.
Regards,
krishnakumar
india, we as a agricultural country we are consumming our own grains from our
ground.
You fought with all other country and make the oil price go up and finally
diverting the issue to india for food price.
Regards,
krishnakumar
Posted by:
krishna
4
US is blaming all other countries to divert the worldsÂ’ attention from
unnecessarily hording petroleum in their reserves on a daily basis. China and
India are spending for their need, but US is hoarding for their greed :)
Howizzzzzzat :)
unnecessarily hording petroleum in their reserves on a daily basis. China and
India are spending for their need, but US is hoarding for their greed :)
Howizzzzzzat :)
Posted by:
Om Naidu
5
This is another ridiculous comment made by white house. Like always, Mr Bush
apparently takes no responsibility in anything that goes wrong. Mr president of
USA did exactly what he has been doing all this time from the beginning of his
term in white house, "pointing fingers". Being most resourceful (maybe not now)
country on planet, only thing USA does is whining. I guess, people of USA got
the govt. they deserve. A President that has personal ties with oil producing
nations, and a common man wonders what is going on with oil prices.
apparently takes no responsibility in anything that goes wrong. Mr president of
USA did exactly what he has been doing all this time from the beginning of his
term in white house, "pointing fingers". Being most resourceful (maybe not now)
country on planet, only thing USA does is whining. I guess, people of USA got
the govt. they deserve. A President that has personal ties with oil producing
nations, and a common man wonders what is going on with oil prices.
Posted by:
dk
6
"It is rediculous comment by the US ppl. India and China are producing that much
food and eating that much food....What is the problem to the bush...
These ppl are not giving their own money to India or china to feed. These are
ppl who are using 1/3rd of oil resources of the world. why can't they think to
reduce it. why can;t they think to improve public transport and stop the stupid
cars for each person. First the US Gov has to take necessary steps to decrease
the use of gas. First look in to your country and then talk about other
ppl...."
I'm not sure I understand your comment. The US comment is simply pointing out
that world demand for oil is increasing. US demand is of course quite high per
capita due to historic reasons: a developed economy and population settlement
patterns established after the advent of the private car, coupled with low oil
taxes. There's zero tax on imported oil, and it's political suicide to increase
the miniscule Federal gasoline tax. The US will be at a disadvantage in a high
oil price world and cannot easily reduce it's per captia consumption. This is a
competitive advantage for nations like India which don't have ingrained
dependence on oil.
As for food, they are simply stating facts. US domestic ethanol production
contributes to increased food prices, but the contribution is small. Normal
supply and demand is the largest driver. Corn-based ethanol is technically a bad
idea, but the US farm lobby prefers it and has virtual veto power over the
Congress and President. No political party can unseat the farm lobby which gets
substantial subsidies for ... corn. There's not much the average American or
their Congressman can really do about the farm lobby - vote against them and you
lose the next election.
It's silly to regard the US as hero or villian in this situation. The US is
plenty good at making a fool of itself and needs no help in that regard ;-), but
the high cost of oil is inevitable as more of the world industrializes.
Ultimately we all need to find a set of alternatives for oil to replace it as an
energy source. That will be a tough job answered by no one technology.
food and eating that much food....What is the problem to the bush...
These ppl are not giving their own money to India or china to feed. These are
ppl who are using 1/3rd of oil resources of the world. why can't they think to
reduce it. why can;t they think to improve public transport and stop the stupid
cars for each person. First the US Gov has to take necessary steps to decrease
the use of gas. First look in to your country and then talk about other
ppl...."
I'm not sure I understand your comment. The US comment is simply pointing out
that world demand for oil is increasing. US demand is of course quite high per
capita due to historic reasons: a developed economy and population settlement
patterns established after the advent of the private car, coupled with low oil
taxes. There's zero tax on imported oil, and it's political suicide to increase
the miniscule Federal gasoline tax. The US will be at a disadvantage in a high
oil price world and cannot easily reduce it's per captia consumption. This is a
competitive advantage for nations like India which don't have ingrained
dependence on oil.
As for food, they are simply stating facts. US domestic ethanol production
contributes to increased food prices, but the contribution is small. Normal
supply and demand is the largest driver. Corn-based ethanol is technically a bad
idea, but the US farm lobby prefers it and has virtual veto power over the
Congress and President. No political party can unseat the farm lobby which gets
substantial subsidies for ... corn. There's not much the average American or
their Congressman can really do about the farm lobby - vote against them and you
lose the next election.
It's silly to regard the US as hero or villian in this situation. The US is
plenty good at making a fool of itself and needs no help in that regard ;-), but
the high cost of oil is inevitable as more of the world industrializes.
Ultimately we all need to find a set of alternatives for oil to replace it as an
energy source. That will be a tough job answered by no one technology.
Posted by:
Robert
- Firms now resort to legal help for lay-offs
- India ranks fourth among top ten internet users
- Mumbai attack to hit business visits from U.S.
- FIIs pull out 77 percent of last year's investment
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Bangalore IT firms offer help to combat terror
- India ranks tenth in spam generation list
- Time to show we are Indians first: PM
- Students protest Wipro recruitment in West Bengal
- TCS focuses SME sector to offer ITaaS
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Mumbai terror: IT clients cancel Bangalore visits
- 'Terrorists have no religion', Aamir Khan
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Online media comes alive during Mumbai attacks
- Karnataka firms seek licence for modern weapons
- Deccan Mujahideen email threatens Delhi
- MNCs pay more to Indian staff
- Future CEOs may emerge from HR departments
- 'IT industry raised India's international image'




